YOUR CART

No products in the cart.

Select Page

Disclosure Diaries Update #67: A summary of notable Disclosure updates from November 18-24, 2024

Nov 29, 2024 | Disclosure Diaries Weekly Updates

This post originally appeared on DisclosureDiaries.com as part of the weekly update series, and has been syndicated here on DeclassifyUAP.org with full permission. We’re thrilled to bring you the internet’s best weekly updates on UAP Disclosure news, in partnership with Disclosure Diaries.

If you’re eager to stay up to date with UAP Disclosure news in a serious way with 0% tolerance for BS, don’t hesitate to share this post or subscribe to the Disclosure Diaries weekly updates here.

 

This past week in Disclosure:

 

Nov 19 – Senate Subcommittee holds a UAP Hearing with Dr. Kosloski, the new Director of AARO

Dr. Jon Kosloski, the new head of AARO (effectively, the Pentagon’s “UFO/UAP” office), was called to provide an update on their past, ongoing and planned activities. The hearing was quite brief, and only Sens. Gillibrand and Ernst had questions prepared. Dr. Kosloski imparted the latest statistics regarding UAP reports, in terms of morphology, hotspots, resolutions, altitude etc…

He also revealed the resolution analysis for several UAP incidents (slides can be access here), some of which (such as the GoFast incident) are quite well-known. AARO’s assessment concluded that the object in that particular case was likely not moving very fast. Some have criticised this analysis, as it ignores some potentially relevant additional context.

Dr. Kosloski also discussed 3 incidents that are considered anomalous/unresolved. Unfortunately, he did not have any prepared slides or supporting data to demonstrate for these particular cases.

Much to the disappointment of neutral observers, it seems unlikely that AARO will voluntarily distribute data for cases that are as yet unresolved.

Nov 19 – Rep. Burchett submits a letter to Donald Trump, urging transparency

The letter urges Trump to investigate the misuse of federal funds, specifically calling out the alleged UAP programs in this context.

Nov 20 – US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin comments on the UAP topic

When asked to comment on recent UAP reports, he responded:

“There are things that happen, have happened and probably will continue to happen that are difficult to explain…”

He also clarified he has not seen any UAP incidents that would be categorised as threatening national security

Nov 20 – AARO Deputy Director allegedly dismisses all claims of an unreported UAP crash retrieval/reverse engineering program

According to a purported LinkedIn exchange, Deputy Director (Tim Phillips) categorically dismisses the bulk of (e.g.) Grusch’s claims.

Nov 20 – Sen. Gillibrand reveals AARO has spoken with 2 whistleblowers with firsthand information

Speaking to Askapol, Sen. Gillibrand mentioned:

“I think it’s going to happen. I think the fact that [AARO] already talked to two whistleblowers with firsthand information — those are whistleblowers who would not come in before. It just gives us another lens of information”

Unfortunately, this was not explored during the Senate Hearing with Dr. Kosloski.

Nov 23 – Rep. Moskowitz calls for a UAP Select Subcomittee

Speaking to Askapol, Rep. Moskowitz underscored the need to establish an investigative body to get to the bottom of the UAP issue:

I want the Speaker to do a Select [UAP] Committee in the next Congress”

This author has long been a proponent of such a Committee, and has summarized the reasoning here.

Nov 22-23 – Sol Foundation holds its 2nd annual UAP Symposium

The Sol Foundation held their second UAP Symposium in San Francisco. A full summary of the event will have to wait until the footage is published.

Event details and attendees can be seen here.

 

Things to look out for in the near future:

 

December

Beyond/currently unknown

  • Following the UAP hearing on the 26th of July, Members of Congress have called for a select committee with subpoena authority, to “go about the task of collecting information from the Pentagon and elsewhere” on unidentified flying objects. There have been conflicting messages from various Members of Congress on whether this is likely to happen anytime soon. Note – a select subcommittee was formally requested on March 13th.
  • Reps. Moskowitz, Luna, and Burchett have repeatedly stated their intent to hold field hearings to overcome stonewalling from the Pentagon and military establishment “I think we [Congress] should try to get into one of these places [housing UAP evidence]…and if they won’t let us in I think we should have a field hearing right outside the building…and the military will have to explain why that is.” – Rep. Moskowitz (D) It is currently unknown when exactly we might expect that to occur, however as of Jan 12 – Rep. Luna confirmed: “I feel confident that we have enough evidence to move forward with our first field hearing. We will be announcing details soon.
  • Several journalists have indicated that first-hand witnesses of the alleged UAP legacy programs are in the process of providing testimony/evidence to the relevant authorities (e.g. the IC IG) and/or are on the verge of making public statements in the near future (Example 1example 2example 3example 4)
  • David Grusch has received additional clearances through DOPSR to discuss some of his (alleged) first-hand knowledge of Legacy programs. He has mentioned he may be covering more of this information in an upcoming Op-Ed

Skimmed through this post but need a quick refresher on how we got to this point? Check out this handy Disclosure Timeline to get up to speed.