This post originally appeared on DisclosureDiaries.com as part of the weekly update series, and has been syndicated here on DeclassifyUAP.org with full permission. We’re thrilled to bring you the internet’s best weekly updates on UAP Disclosure news, in partnership with Disclosure Diaries.
If you’re eager to stay up to date with UAP Disclosure news in a serious way with 0% tolerance for BS, don’t hesitate to share this post or subscribe to the Disclosure Diaries weekly updates here.
This past week in Disclosure:
Mar 26 – the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies publishes pattern study regarding 1945-1975 Military and Public activities
The SCU published a peer-reviewed study: UAP Activity Pattern Study 1945-1975 Military and Public Activities, by SCU members Larry J. Hancock, Ian M. Porritt, Sean Grosvenor, and Larry Cates.
This study is the 3rd in a series of examinations of UAP activity in the post-World War II era.
Mar 28 – “I’ve told you guys, I think that there is absolutely, without a doubt, something there, and, I think, from the level of pushback that we get, it’s pretty obvious. And so I look forward to being able to hopefully get something seriously considered for the next Congress in regards to an actual committee, because I think it should be investigated.” – Rep. Luna
Speaking with Askapol, Rep. Luna reiterates her perception that Members of Congress are being stonewalled by certain elements in the IC/DoD. She refers to ongoing efforts to establish a more rigorous approach to thoroughly investigating the various UAP-related claims.
Mar 29 – “We’re recognizing that there are things that are difficult to explain sometimes, and our biggest concern is for national defense purposes: What are they? Where are they from?” – Senator Rounds
In conversation with Askapol, Senator Mike Rounds touches on the difficulty of navigating the world of sensitive military programs:
MR: “Y’know, I mean, look, we’re recognizing that there are things that are difficult to explain sometimes, and our biggest concern is for national defense purposes: what are they? Where are they from? And the natural suggestion is they may very well be either ours or an adversary’s. We do not want to get into a position of exposing any one of our very sensitive programs, but we’re not sure where they’re coming from. So, if the House wants to include specific language — we tried to and the House was…”
ML: “Are you read in on every program?”
MR: “Well, you never know if you’re read in or not.”
Mar 30 – the Telegraph covers Tim Gallaudet’s interest in USO’s: Former US Navy admiral leads search for underwater alien USOs
An article published in the Telegraph, (archived, pay-wall free version here) explores the topic of Unidentified Submerged Objects (USOs), and more specifically – retired Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet’s interest in concertedly exploring this issue with scientific rigor.
Gallaudet, who was formerly the head of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), “is launching a probe into unidentified submersible objects (USOs) and, in particular, a strange anomaly seen on the seabed off the coast of California.”
Things to look out for in the near future:
April
- According to Senator Gillibrand – a public hearing in line with AARO’s latest report can be expected soon, saying –”I’ll probably have another hearing aligned with that public report.”
Beyond/currently unknown
- Following the UAP hearing on the 26th of July, Members of Congress have called for a select committee with subpoena authority, to “go about the task of collecting information from the Pentagon and elsewhere” on unidentified flying objects. There have been conflicting messages from various Members of Congress on whether this is likely to happen anytime soon.
Note – a select subcommittee was formally requested on March 13th. - Reps. Moskowitz, Luna, and Burchett have repeatedly stated their intent to hold field hearings to overcome stonewalling from the Pentagon and military establishment”I think we [Congress] should try to get into one of these places [housing UAP evidence]…and if they won’t let us in I think we should have a field hearing right outside the building…and the military will have to explain why that is.” – Rep. Moskowitz (D)It is currently unknown when exactly we might expect that to occur, however as of Jan 12 – Rep. Luna confirmed:”I feel confident that we have enough evidence to move forward with our first field hearing. u/mattgaetzu/JaredEMoskowitz u/timburchett . We will be announcing details soon.“
- Several journalists have indicated that first-hand witnesses of the alleged UAP legacy programs are in the process of providing testimony/evidence to the relevant authorities (e.g. the IC IG) and/or are on the verge of making public statements in the near future (Example 1, example 2, example 3, example 4)
- David Grusch has received additional clearances through DOPSR to discuss some of his (alleged) first-hand knowledge of Legacy programs. He has mentioned he may be covering more of this information in an upcoming Op-Ed
- Some commentators have speculated that the architects of the UAPDA (e.g. Sens. Schumer/Rounds et al) are working diligently behind the scenes to continue furthering serious legislative UAP transparency efforts
Skimmed through this post but need a quick refresher on how we got to this point? Check out this handy Disclosure Timeline to get up to speed.